dc.description.abstract | Se evaluó el efecto de diferentes concentraciones de orina como fertilizante orgánico (FO)
sobre propiedades de productividad en pasto kikuyo (Cenchrus clandestinum) en fincas de
Carmen de Carupa, se evaluó crecimiento a partir de Biomasa, Número de hojas (NH) y
altura (AP). Este trabajo se realizó con la asociación de ganaderos del Carmen de Carupa
(ASOGACC), más específicamente en tres fincas, evaluadas individualmente en cada una
se delimitaron 9 parcelas con una medida de 3 m2
, se manejaron 3 tratamientos con 3
repeticiones, en cada finca se trabajaron diferente porcentajes de aplicación, la fertilización
se realizó con atomizador y bomba de aspersión de 20 litros. Para la finca 1 se dio
diferencias en la variable (AP), para la variable (NH) se dieron diferencias y para biomasa
no se dieron diferencias. Para la finca 2 en la variable (AP) se dieron diferencias, en la
variable (NH) no hay diferencias y en la variable biomasa no se dieron diferencias. Para la
finca 3 se dieron diferencias en la variable (AP), para la variable (NH) si se presentaron
diferencias y para la variable biomasa no se presentaron diferencias. Con estos datos se
puede concluir que en ninguna de las 3 fincas las variables evaluadas presentaron reacción
con la aplicación de la orina. El kikuyo forraje trabajado en las tres fincas no presentó
reacciones negativas, se evidenció un crecimiento normal. Sobre la cantidad de orina a
utilizar se puede decir que hasta en un 75% que fue la concentración más alta de orina no
influenció negativamente.
The effect of different concentrations of urine as organic fertilizer (FO) on productivity
properties in kikuyo grass (Cenchrus clandestinum) in Carmen de Carupa farms was
evaluated, growth was evaluated from Biomass, Number of leaves (NH) and height (AP).
This work was carried out with the Carmen de Carupa cattle ranchers association
(ASOGACC), more specifically in three farms, evaluated individually in each one, 9 plots with
a measurement of 3 m2 were delimited, 3 treatments were managed with 3 repetitions, in
each farm Different application percentages were worked, the fertilization was carried out
with a spray bottle and a 20-liter spray pump. For farm 1 there were differences in the variable
(AP), for the variable (NH) there were differences and for biomass there were no differences.
For farm 2 in the variable (AP) there were differences, in the variable (NH) there were no
differences and in the biomass variable there were no differences. For farm 3 there were
differences in the variable (AP), for the variable (NH) there were differences and for the
biomass variable there were no differences. With these data it can be concluded that in none of the 3 farms did the evaluated variables show a reaction with the application of urine. The
kikuyo fodder worked in the three farms did not present negative reactions, normal growth
was evidenced. Regarding the amount of urine to be used, it can be said that up to 75%,
which was the highest concentration of urine, did not have a negative influence. | es_CO |